Description Module
The Description Module contains narrative descriptions of the clinical trial, including a brief summary and detailed description. These descriptions provide important information about the study's purpose, methodology, and key details in language accessible to both researchers and the general public.
Description Module path is as follows:
Study -> Protocol Section -> Description Module
Description Module
Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-25 @ 3:29 AM
Ignite Modification Date:
2025-12-25 @ 3:29 AM
NCT ID:
NCT07104305
Brief Summary:
This study aims to test in what way a care strategy incorporating frequent contact can benefit patients with musculoskeletal condition that necessitates some adaptation and resiliency to symptoms and limitations that are expected to be either long-lasting or permanent.
Patients will be randomized into either group A, where they will receive the standard amount of contact with their clinician, or group B, in which they will have contact with their clinican more frequently.
The communication strategy may utilize text, email, portal, phone, video or other options as agreed on. The frequency will be at least once a week. All patients will complete a set of questionnaires at the end of the visit.
Detailed Description:
Irregular and uncomfortable bodily symptoms are common. Most are well adapted in a healthy life. People seek care when a symptom becomes a concern. Even the effort to attend a routine healthy check-up is usually based on not wanting to miss anything, which is accompanied by at least a slight concern that a problem might be found. People that are seeking care are unsettled to some degree.
This unsettled feeling is often rooted in or worsened by unhelpful thoughts (less effective cognitive coping strategies). An example of a less effective cognitive coping strategy is rumination on worst-case thoughts (catastrophic thinking). The unsettled feeling is worse when thoughts are perceived as facts (cognitive fusion). Cognitive fusion is greater when people are under greater stress or distress.
Clinicians can help people feel better and do more by gently correcting these misconceptions. And when correction of misconceptions is to some degree at odds with a person's experience of reality, expert advice may seem impersonal, dismissive, and uncaring.
Adherence to medical expertise is enhanced by a trusting relationship with one's clinicians. There are several methods for nurturing a clinician-patient relationship. One is to make small agreements or compromises such as ordering a test that is not likely to yield useful information, has a small risk of harm, and uses resources and doing so in the context of efforts to move towards more effective cognitive coping strategies and greater self-efficacy. Another is to use educational tools such as decision aids to depersonalize the transfer of expertise. A third approach is use more frequent contact to deepen the relationship.
This study posits that establishing a frequent-contact plan with a patient that might benefit from a healthier inner narrative can improve health using few resources other than clinician time, with a good patient experience compared to the typical single or infrequent in person specialist office visits.
Study:
NCT07104305
Study Brief:
Protocol Section:
NCT07104305