For researchers submitting trial data to ClinicalTrials.gov, the Adverse Events module is one of four mandatory results sections. It requires reporting in three primary categories: All-Cause Mortality: A table tracking all deaths that occurred during the study, regardless of cause. Serious Adverse Events (SAEs): A tabular summary of events resulting in death, life-threatening conditions, hospitalization, or significant disability. Other Adverse Events: A table for non-serious events that exceed a specific frequency threshold, such as 5% within any study arm.
Adverse Events Module path is as follows:
Study -> Results Section -> Adverse Events Module -> Event Groups
Study -> Results Section -> Adverse Events Module -> Serious Events
Study -> Results Section -> Adverse Events Module -> Other Events
| Title | Description | Deaths # Affected | Deaths # At Risk | Serious # Affected | Serious # At Risk | Other # Affected | Other # At Risk | View |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intervention - Market | Partner sites that are randomized to the "Intervention - Market" will plan and start (or expand) a Mobile Market and run the Market weekly for at least 10 months (non necessarily nonconsecutive). The Mobile Market will follow the Veggie Van Model which includes a "share model", price reductions (incentives), and an educational component. Mobile Market program implementation: Mobile Market program implementation includes utilizing a Veggie Van model which sells reduced cost locally-grown produce in communities with barriers to accessing fresh F\&Vs because of availability, cost, or lack of produce preparation skills.The Veggie Van visits sites that already serve the target market (e.g., lower-income housing communities, community health centers, community colleges). While Mobile Market programs vary in their model and operation, we believe that the three components of Veggie Van's success are it's "share" model, price reductions (incentives), and educational component | 0 | None | 0 | 426 | 0 | 426 | View |
| Control - Planning | At Control - Planning (comparison) sites, engagement will focus on involving community members in food access program planning and research. It is anticipated that each organization will create one or more community advisory committees to oversee their food access work. At comparison sites, engagement efforts will be more generally centered on food access and understanding what types of programs would be most acceptable. Examples of community engagement activities include community forums and listening sessions, informational tables at community events, and establishment of text, e-mail or social media sites for ongoing communication and feedback around food access issues. As part of this community engagement work, partners will collect contact information from community members that will assist in the data collection process. | 0 | None | 0 | 273 | 0 | 273 | View |