Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-25 @ 1:19 AM
Ignite Modification Date:
2026-03-02 @ 3:43 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT06660693
Status:
RECRUITING
Last Update Posted:
2025-06-22
First Post:
2024-10-25
Is Gene Therapy:
True
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
Comparison of Medical RESCUE Strategies for Patients With Steroid-refractory Acute Severe Ulcerative Colitis
Sponsor:
McMaster University
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
Comparison of Medical RESCUE Strategies for Patients With Steroid-refractory Acute Severe Ulcerative Colitis: an Open-label Randomized Controlled Trial (RESCUE-UC).
Status:
RECRUITING
Status Verified Date:
2025-06
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
RESCUE UC
Brief Summary:
This study aims to examine patients with acute severe UC who are refractory to intravenous corticosteroids and determine whether a strategy of using upadacitinib first followed by infliximab in upadacitinib non-responders is non-inferior to conventional management with infliximab only.
Detailed Description:
In acute hospitalized severe, steroid refractory UC, only two medical rescue therapies have been found efficacious in controlled trials and recommended in management, infliximab and cyclosporine. Due to toxicity and nuance in using cyclosporine, infliximab is by far the most commonly used medical rescue therapy in this setting. There is emerging retrospective and prospective case series data suggesting JAK inhibitors, such as tofacitinib or upadacitinib, could also be used for this patient population. JAK inhibitors offer potential advantages including convenience of oral therapy, efficacy independent of serum albumin levels, and no concern for immunogenicity as is seen with anti-TNFs. They also offer a short half-life and are eliminated by humans within 48 hours of the last dose administered. This could be beneficial, as it may offer a chance to use a JAK inhibitor first and switch to infliximab in patients who do not respond to a JAK inhibitor, as theoretically cumulative immunosuppression should not be as high transitioning from a JAK inhibitor to infliximab, as compared to using JAK inhibitor after infliximab failure since there will still be lots of infliximab present owing to its long half-life. It is unclear how JAK inhibitors compare to our standard of care and where they should be positioned in acute severe UC. This study aims to examine patients with acute severe UC who are refractory to intravenous corticosteroids and determine whether a strategy of using upadacitinib first followed by infliximab in upadacitinib non-responders is non-inferior to conventional management with infliximab only.
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
True
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: