Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-24 @ 1:37 PM
Ignite Modification Date:
2026-02-20 @ 10:45 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT04130295
Status:
COMPLETED
Last Update Posted:
2021-07-27
First Post:
2019-10-07
Is Gene Therapy:
True
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
Influence of Wearable Intensive Nerve Stimulation on Spasticity and Function in Persons With Spinal Cord Injury
Sponsor:
Shepherd Center, Atlanta GA
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
Influence of Wearable Intensive Nerve Stimulation on Spasticity and Function in Persons With Spinal Cord Injury
Status:
COMPLETED
Status Verified Date:
2021-03
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
Spasticity is muscle spasms, bouncing (clonus) or stiffness that can negatively impact the quality of life of people with spinal cord injury (SCI). In people with spinal cord injury, spasticity can limit muscle control of the arms and hands and cause pain, discomfort, and frustration. Transcutaneous electrical stimulation has been shown to reduce spasticity after SCI. However, this type of stimulation's effects during prolonged, at-home use has not been well studied. Additionally, traditional stimulation techniques are often only available in the clinic. Therefore, this study aims to identify if wearable intensive nerve stimulation decreases spasticity in the legs of people with SCI, and if this intervention is usable and desirable to individuals with SCI.
Detailed Description:
Involuntary muscle activation, also referred to as spasticity is a common characteristic of spinal cord injuries. It can present as stiffness, clonus, and spasms that can impact a person's ability to perform daily tasks. Over half of individuals with spinal cord injuries that have spasticity report medication alone does not control the spasticity. Because of this clinical research is investigation different ways to manage spasticity.
Stretching and vibration have demonstrated the ability to reduce spasticity but only for short periods of time requiring repeated use of the intervention. Additionally, vibration devices are not very practical to implement at home due to their high cost. Due to these factors, a solution that could be used multiple times a day and remains cost effective is needed.
Transcutaneous electrical stimulation (TENS) has also demonstrated effectiveness in reducing spasticity after one session but shows greater benefit when it is able to be used for multiple sessions. A wearable intensive nerve stimulator (WINS) device has been shown to be safe for daily wear which makes it a feasible solution to address spasticity at home. Research has not yet looked at the efficacy of using the WINS device for spasticity and this study proposes to begin to fill that gap.
Stretching and vibration have demonstrated the ability to reduce spasticity but only for short periods of time requiring repeated use of the intervention. Additionally, vibration devices are not very practical to implement at home due to their high cost. Due to these factors, a solution that could be used multiple times a day and remains cost effective is needed.
Transcutaneous electrical stimulation (TENS) has also demonstrated effectiveness in reducing spasticity after one session but shows greater benefit when it is able to be used for multiple sessions. A wearable intensive nerve stimulator (WINS) device has been shown to be safe for daily wear which makes it a feasible solution to address spasticity at home. Research has not yet looked at the efficacy of using the WINS device for spasticity and this study proposes to begin to fill that gap.
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
False
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: