Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-24 @ 11:29 PM
Ignite Modification Date:
2026-03-05 @ 5:07 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT02710656
Status:
COMPLETED
Last Update Posted:
2020-01-23
First Post:
2016-03-07
Is Gene Therapy:
True
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
Study Comparing Legflow Versus Bare Balloon Angioplasty for Treatment of Atherosclerotic Disease
Sponsor:
Cardionovum GmbH
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Legflow - DCB (Cardionovum) Versus Bare Balloon Angioplasty for the Treatment of Atherosclerotic Disease in the Superficial Femoral & Popliteal Segment
Status:
COMPLETED
Status Verified Date:
2020-01
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
A randomized multicentric study for endovascular treatment of patients with obstructive disease in the SFA (superficial femoral artery) and in the popliteal artery.
Detailed Description:
This interventional study will collect data about the treatment of de novo lesions or restenotic lesions. Restenotic lesions that are previously DCB (drug coated balloon) treated or in-stent restenosis are excluded in this study.
The primary objective of this randomized study is to compare the efficacy of the DCB (Legflow - Cardionovum) versus POBA for the treatment of de novo lesions or restenosis in the SFA and in the popliteal artery (segment P1 -P2) by assessing the binary restenosis rate with duplex ultrasonography at 12 months.
The secondary endpoints are the assessment of the immediate procedural outcome, distribution of Rutherford, mortality, target lesion revascularization (TLR), target extremity revascularization (TER), amputation and anklebrachial index (ABI).
For each patient enrolled, data will be collected up to 12 months after the procedure.
The primary objective of this randomized study is to compare the efficacy of the DCB (Legflow - Cardionovum) versus POBA for the treatment of de novo lesions or restenosis in the SFA and in the popliteal artery (segment P1 -P2) by assessing the binary restenosis rate with duplex ultrasonography at 12 months.
The secondary endpoints are the assessment of the immediate procedural outcome, distribution of Rutherford, mortality, target lesion revascularization (TLR), target extremity revascularization (TER), amputation and anklebrachial index (ABI).
For each patient enrolled, data will be collected up to 12 months after the procedure.
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
None
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: