Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-24 @ 1:21 PM
Ignite Modification Date:
2026-02-10 @ 10:38 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT00290095
Status:
COMPLETED
Last Update Posted:
2011-03-08
First Post:
2006-02-09
Is Gene Therapy:
True
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
Quality of Life in Patients With Multiple Myeloma
Sponsor:
Ullevaal University Hospital
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
Quality of Life in Patients With Multiple Myeloma
Status:
COMPLETED
Status Verified Date:
2011-03
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
The purpose of this study is to determine Clinically important difference and Response shift in quality of life in patients with Multiple Myeloma.
Detailed Description:
Multiple myeloma is a plasma cell tumor with an annual incidence of 6 pr. 100 000. In the absence of curative treatment, the aim of the therapy is not only to induce an objective response and a prolongation of survival but also to improve the patients quality of life.
This project will raise two problems which make QoL-data hard to interpret
1. In a clinical trial where many patients are included, statistically significant differences are obtained. However, there is widespread agreement that p-values do not indicate whether a particular finding has clinical significance because statistical significance does not necessarily equate to a meaningful difference or change in QoL. A crucial task for clinicians in interpreting trial-based QoL results is to determine if the observed change is clinically important to the patient.
2. When measuring changes in QoL in a pretest-posttest design,response shift can affect results. Patients with advanced disease can report surprisingly good QoL.Including response shift into quality of life research would allow a better understanding of changes in the QoL that patients report.
This project will raise two problems which make QoL-data hard to interpret
1. In a clinical trial where many patients are included, statistically significant differences are obtained. However, there is widespread agreement that p-values do not indicate whether a particular finding has clinical significance because statistical significance does not necessarily equate to a meaningful difference or change in QoL. A crucial task for clinicians in interpreting trial-based QoL results is to determine if the observed change is clinically important to the patient.
2. When measuring changes in QoL in a pretest-posttest design,response shift can affect results. Patients with advanced disease can report surprisingly good QoL.Including response shift into quality of life research would allow a better understanding of changes in the QoL that patients report.
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
Is an Unapproved Device?:
Is a PPSD?:
Is a US Export?:
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: