Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-24 @ 9:49 PM
Ignite Modification Date:
2026-02-20 @ 3:53 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT04202432
Status:
COMPLETED
Last Update Posted:
2019-12-18
First Post:
2019-12-16
Is Gene Therapy:
True
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
Clinical Validation of Algorithms for Mean Systemic Filling Pressure and Automated Cardiac Output
Sponsor:
Catharina Ziekenhuis Eindhoven
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
PP3D - Prospective Combined Validation of an Algorithm for Measurement of Mean Systemic Filling Pressure and Comparison of Invasively Measured Cardiac Output Versus Cardiac Output Calculated by 3D TOE and Carotid Ultrasound.
Status:
COMPLETED
Status Verified Date:
2019-12
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
PP3D
Brief Summary:
Prospective combined clinical validation of an algorithmic calculated mean systemic filling pressure (Pms-Nav) with the gold standard for Pms (Pms calculated from venous return curves during inspiratory hold procedures with incremental airway pressures; Pms-Insp). Secondary correlation between invasive cardiac output measurement versus 3D TOE and carotid echo doppler measured cardiac output.
Detailed Description:
Background of the study:
Volume-state in critically ill patients is a difficult parameter to determine, and knowledge about it could make the difference between life or death concerning proper treatment. Determination of volume state starts with adequate 3D transesophageal echocardiography (TOE) in the operation room, including with non-invasive doppler carotid artery measures. TOE is a standardly used method in cardiac surgery. Because echocardiography only gives information about volume status at a certain timepoint, a real-time continuous value reflecting volume-status is needed. "Mean systemic filling pressure (Pms)" appears to be a promising value reflecting volume status. There is a reliable, but cumbersome method available which to date serves as a gold standard to determine Pms (Pms calculated by constructing venous return curves during incremental levels of airway pressure, thereby simulating a decrease in preload --\> Pms-Insp). However, this method cannot be used in daily clinical practice because it is laborious and cumbersome. Therefore there is a need for a non-invasive methods measuring Pms, which could now be determined by a computerized algorithm with the Navigator-device (Pms-Nav). It is key to compare this Pms-Nav with its gold standard (Pms-Insp) in order to establish a clinical validation for Pms-Nav.
Objective of the study:
1. Is there a good correlation between Pms-Nav and Pms-Insp?
2. Is there a good correlation between invasive continuous cardiac output measurement (by thermodilution and pulse-contour analyse detected by the PiCCO-device) and 3D transoesophageal echocardiography (TOE) and carotid echo doppler?
Volume-state in critically ill patients is a difficult parameter to determine, and knowledge about it could make the difference between life or death concerning proper treatment. Determination of volume state starts with adequate 3D transesophageal echocardiography (TOE) in the operation room, including with non-invasive doppler carotid artery measures. TOE is a standardly used method in cardiac surgery. Because echocardiography only gives information about volume status at a certain timepoint, a real-time continuous value reflecting volume-status is needed. "Mean systemic filling pressure (Pms)" appears to be a promising value reflecting volume status. There is a reliable, but cumbersome method available which to date serves as a gold standard to determine Pms (Pms calculated by constructing venous return curves during incremental levels of airway pressure, thereby simulating a decrease in preload --\> Pms-Insp). However, this method cannot be used in daily clinical practice because it is laborious and cumbersome. Therefore there is a need for a non-invasive methods measuring Pms, which could now be determined by a computerized algorithm with the Navigator-device (Pms-Nav). It is key to compare this Pms-Nav with its gold standard (Pms-Insp) in order to establish a clinical validation for Pms-Nav.
Objective of the study:
1. Is there a good correlation between Pms-Nav and Pms-Insp?
2. Is there a good correlation between invasive continuous cardiac output measurement (by thermodilution and pulse-contour analyse detected by the PiCCO-device) and 3D transoesophageal echocardiography (TOE) and carotid echo doppler?
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: