Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-24 @ 5:49 PM
Ignite Modification Date:
2026-02-10 @ 8:19 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT00866268
Status:
COMPLETED
Last Update Posted:
2009-03-20
First Post:
2009-03-19
Is Gene Therapy:
True
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
Low Versus High Pressure Suction Drainage After Total Knee Arthroplasty
Sponsor:
Fundació Institut de Recerca de l'Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
"Low Versus High Pressure Suction Drainage After Total Knee Arthroplasty: a Double Blind Randomized Controlled Trial"
Status:
COMPLETED
Status Verified Date:
2009-03
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
Principal hypothesis:
A low suction drainage (-50 mmHg) reduce a 25% the blood loss with respect a standard closed drainage (-700 mmHg) following total knee arthroplasty.
A low suction drainage (-50 mmHg) reduce a 25% the blood loss with respect a standard closed drainage (-700 mmHg) following total knee arthroplasty.
Detailed Description:
Secondary's hypothesis:
* It don't expect differences in:
1. Incidence of hematomas
2. Incidence in surgery wound infection
3. Time of immobilization
4. Duration of hospitalization
* The low suction drainage (-50 mmHg) will be more cost-effective than the standard closed drainage (-700 mmHg)
* It don't expect differences in:
1. Incidence of hematomas
2. Incidence in surgery wound infection
3. Time of immobilization
4. Duration of hospitalization
* The low suction drainage (-50 mmHg) will be more cost-effective than the standard closed drainage (-700 mmHg)
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
True
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
None
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: