Viewing Study NCT03148392


Ignite Creation Date: 2025-12-24 @ 3:40 PM
Ignite Modification Date: 2026-02-27 @ 10:34 AM
Study NCT ID: NCT03148392
Status: UNKNOWN
Last Update Posted: 2019-08-28
First Post: 2017-04-27
Is Gene Therapy: True
Has Adverse Events: False

Brief Title: Assess Differences in Pain Following Cryo and Radiofrequency Atrial Fibrillation Ablation
Sponsor: Sumit Verma, MD
Organization:

Study Overview

Official Title: A Prospective Comparison of Quality of Life Following Atrial Fibrillation Ablation Using the Arctic Front Advance Cryo Balloon Compared to Contact Force Sensing Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation
Status: UNKNOWN
Status Verified Date: 2019-08
Last Known Status: RECRUITING
Delayed Posting: No
If Stopped, Why?: Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access: False
If Expanded Access, NCT#: N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status: N/A
Acronym: None
Brief Summary: The primary objective is to assess any differences in patient quality of life between Cryo Balloon ablation and Radiofrequency ablation in the treatment of atrial fibrillation. The study will also assess any differences in the amount and duration of pain medication required after the ablation.
Detailed Description: Currently there are several different accepted techniques for performing ablation of atrial fibrillation. The two primary techniques currently in use in our center for atrial fibrillation are Cryo Balloon and Radiofrequency ablation.

Based on personal observation, it is felt that patients undergoing Radiofrequency ablation have a higher incidence of chest discomfort and subsequently a greater requirement for pain medications post procedure as compared to those patients undergoing Cryo ablation.

Study Oversight

Has Oversight DMC: False
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?: None
Is a FDA Regulated Device?: None
Is an Unapproved Device?: None
Is a PPSD?: None
Is a US Export?: False
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: