Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-25 @ 4:54 AM
Ignite Modification Date:
2026-03-13 @ 9:44 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT07021118
Status:
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Last Update Posted:
2025-07-02
First Post:
2025-05-29
Is Gene Therapy:
True
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
Mild TBI in the Emergency Department
Sponsor:
Mario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
The Use of Brain Computed Tomography in the Management of the Patient With Mild TBI in the Emergency Department
Status:
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Status Verified Date:
2025-05
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
Mild TBI is one of the main causes of admission to the Emergency Department (ED). Brain computed tomography (CT) is one of the most widely used diagnostic tools to assess the presence of intracranial lesions. However, in Western countries, 85-95% of CT scans performed in the ED for mild TBI are negative. It is therefore conceivable that a significant number of CTs could be avoided by a more careful use of this exam. On the other hand, excessive use of CT exposes patients to unnecessary radiation, increases healthcare costs and slows down the management of patients in the ED.
This study aims to analyze the variability in the use of CT in mild TBI in Italian EDs, validate the scores designed to help the physician decide when to use it and develop a model that predicts the medium-term outcome of patients with mild head trauma.
This study aims to analyze the variability in the use of CT in mild TBI in Italian EDs, validate the scores designed to help the physician decide when to use it and develop a model that predicts the medium-term outcome of patients with mild head trauma.
Detailed Description:
Mild TBI is one of the most frequent causes of emergency department (ED) admission and is characterized by an increasing incidence. Brain computed tomography (CT) is a fundamental diagnostic tool to assess the presence and extent of any brain lesions and is commonly used in the ED for timely diagnosis. In particular, it allows to identify structural damage, such as hemorrhages, which could put the patient's life at risk if not treated promptly. However, the use of CT involves exposure to ionizing radiation, increases healthcare costs and can slow down the flow of patients in the ED. Considering that it is estimated that between 85% and 95% of patients with mild TBI do not have any brain lesions, a careful clinical evaluation is essential in indicating this investigation. These elements generate significant variability in the use of CT in mild TBI.
Several families of criteria and guidelines have been developed to support clinical decisions in this area, including the Canadian CT Head Rule, the Nexus II criteria, the New Orleans criteria and the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidelines on head trauma. Although these criteria have been validated in multiple studies, their main objective is the identification of positive CT. This represents a limitation, since in many cases marginal brain injuries do not cause clinically relevant consequences or require specific interventions or treatments.
In this context, the present study aims to answer several research questions. First, the variability of CT use in Italian EDs will be analyzed, with the aim of identifying any discrepancies and the factors that determine them. The ultimate goal is to improve the quality of care for patients with mild head trauma. Second, the validity of the main tools proposed in the literature to support the clinical decision on the use of CT will be evaluated. Finally, the study aims to develop a new decision-making tool that can help ED physicians identify patients at risk of clinically relevant events in the short term, in order to facilitate a more accurate use of CT.
Several families of criteria and guidelines have been developed to support clinical decisions in this area, including the Canadian CT Head Rule, the Nexus II criteria, the New Orleans criteria and the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidelines on head trauma. Although these criteria have been validated in multiple studies, their main objective is the identification of positive CT. This represents a limitation, since in many cases marginal brain injuries do not cause clinically relevant consequences or require specific interventions or treatments.
In this context, the present study aims to answer several research questions. First, the variability of CT use in Italian EDs will be analyzed, with the aim of identifying any discrepancies and the factors that determine them. The ultimate goal is to improve the quality of care for patients with mild head trauma. Second, the validity of the main tools proposed in the literature to support the clinical decision on the use of CT will be evaluated. Finally, the study aims to develop a new decision-making tool that can help ED physicians identify patients at risk of clinically relevant events in the short term, in order to facilitate a more accurate use of CT.
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: