Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-25 @ 3:38 AM
Ignite Modification Date:
2026-03-14 @ 6:35 AM
Study NCT ID:
NCT02456402
Status:
COMPLETED
Last Update Posted:
2019-04-03
First Post:
2015-05-18
Is Gene Therapy:
True
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
Drug Coated Balloon Compared to Bare Metal Stent for de Novo Coronary Artery Lesions
Sponsor:
Ulsan University Hospital
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
Randomized Controlled Trial of Drug Coated Balloon Compared to Bare Metal Stent Using FFR-guidance for the Treatment of de Novo Coronary Artery Lesions
Status:
COMPLETED
Status Verified Date:
2019-04
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
This randomized trial will assess the efficacy of Drug Coated Balloon (DCB) compared to Bare Metal Stent (BMS) using Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR) guidance for de novo coronary artery lesions in patients unable to tolerate dual antiplatelet therapy and at high risk of bleeding. Patients will be randomized after balloon angioplasty to receive either DCB or BMS. Endpoints are late luminal loss at 9 months, and major adverse cardiac events including arterial thrombosis at 1, 9 and 12 months.
Detailed Description:
Although the use of drug-eluting stents (DES) has reduced in-stent restenosis when compared to bare metal stents (BMS) and decreased the incidence of adverse clinical events (1-2), DES therapy is limited by delayed arterial healing, late acquired malapposition and neo-atherosclerosis leading to an increased risk of late stent thrombosis and late restenosis (3-4). Conceptually, a permanent stent inhibits advantageous vascular remodeling and durable polymer provokes excessive inflammation (5). Non-stent based local drug delivery using paclitaxel-coated balloon has emerged as a new clinical treatment alternative by maintaining the anti-proliferative properties of DES (6). There is limited data on the efficacy of Drug Coated Balloon (DCB) treatment for de novo coronary lesions when compared to BMS. To avoid the risk of abrupt closure of target lesion after balloon angioplasty, a reliable predictor of coronary flow is necessary especially in de novo lesions of major coronary arteries. Therefore, using fractional flow reserve (FFR) after angioplasty as a good indicator of immediate functional improvement and reduced restenosis (7), the aim of this study is to assess the efficacy of DCB treatment compared to BMS in patients with de novo coronary artery lesions.
Patients with de novo coronary artery lesions with \> 50% stenosis in a single vessel and at high risk of bleeding with the inability to tolerate dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) will be included in this trial. Patients will undergo balloon angioplasty and if the FFR post balloon angioplasty is \> 0.80, they will be randomized to receive either DCB or BMS. Patients will receive Quantitative Coronary Angiography (QCA) analysis at 9 months follow-up. Endpoints are late luminal loss at 9 months and major adverse events including arterial thrombosis at 1, 9 and 12 months and these endpoints will be compared between DCB and BMS groups.
Patients with de novo coronary artery lesions with \> 50% stenosis in a single vessel and at high risk of bleeding with the inability to tolerate dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) will be included in this trial. Patients will undergo balloon angioplasty and if the FFR post balloon angioplasty is \> 0.80, they will be randomized to receive either DCB or BMS. Patients will receive Quantitative Coronary Angiography (QCA) analysis at 9 months follow-up. Endpoints are late luminal loss at 9 months and major adverse events including arterial thrombosis at 1, 9 and 12 months and these endpoints will be compared between DCB and BMS groups.
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
True
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
None
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: