Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-25 @ 2:59 AM
Ignite Modification Date:
2026-03-11 @ 1:30 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT01583933
Status:
UNKNOWN
Last Update Posted:
2012-04-27
First Post:
2012-04-23
Is Gene Therapy:
True
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
Essix Retainer vs Hawley Retainer
Sponsor:
CES University
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
PHASE 3 STUDY OF THE EFFECTIVITY OF TWO RETAINERS IN THE DENTAL AND OCCLUSAL STABILITY
Status:
UNKNOWN
Status Verified Date:
2012-04
Last Known Status:
RECRUITING
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
retainer
Brief Summary:
There are several factors involved in the decision and the retention plan, such as occlusion, patient age, etiology of malocclusion, the speed of the correction, the length of the cusps and health of the tissues involved, relationships inclined planes, size of the arches, harmony of the arches, muscle pressure, interdental proximal contact, cell metabolism and atmospheric pressure. Given these concepts, we need to find grounds to enable decision making with respect to the retainer that offers the best features of containment and stability.
Detailed Description:
This study aims to assess the stability of tooth position and occlusal retention during treatment with two types of retainers, Essix type retainer and the retainer plate type Hawley in individuals who have completed their growth ending orthodontic treatment at the Faculty of Dentistry University of Antioquia and CES University Medellín
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
None
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: