Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-25 @ 1:04 AM
Ignite Modification Date:
2026-02-21 @ 10:12 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT03157193
Status:
COMPLETED
Last Update Posted:
2017-05-17
First Post:
2017-05-15
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
True
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
Effect of Hyaluronic Acid on Perimplantitis
Sponsor:
Universidad de Granada
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
Effect of Hyaluronic Acid on Peri-implant Pathology: A Double-blind, Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial.
Status:
COMPLETED
Status Verified Date:
2017-05
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
The effect of the hyaluronic acid treatment on peri-implantitis has not been tested. The aim was to analyze the effect of a hyaluronic acid-containing gel on the clinical variables and the expression of biochemical inflammatory markers in the crevicular fluid of implants receiving perimplantitis treatment.
Detailed Description:
The aim was to analyze the effect of a hyaluronic acid-containing gel on the clinical variables and the expression of biochemical inflammatory markers in the crevicular fluid of implants receiving perimplantitis treatment.
A randomized, controlled, double-blind clinical trial was designed on 100 perimplantitis affected implants placed in 61 subjects. Inclusion criteria were implants with at least 1 year of functional loading and with diagnosis of perimplantitis following the criteria from the Association of Dental Implantology. All implant received perimplantitis treatment. Each patient was randomly assigned to receive a gel containing 0.8% HA (Test group), a gel without HA (Placebo group) or no gel treatment (Control group). After a first gel application at baseline, test and placebo patients performed gel applications at home 3 times/day for 45 days. Clinical variables of each implant were recorded at baseline, 45 and 90 days (probing depth, attachment loss, bleeding). Intraoral radiographs of each implants were performed to measure marginal bone level. Peri-implant crevicular fluid was collected from each implant at baseline and after 45 days of treatment, to assess IL-1β and TNFα levels by ELISA technique. Clustering analysis, considering multiple implants within each patient, was performed.
A randomized, controlled, double-blind clinical trial was designed on 100 perimplantitis affected implants placed in 61 subjects. Inclusion criteria were implants with at least 1 year of functional loading and with diagnosis of perimplantitis following the criteria from the Association of Dental Implantology. All implant received perimplantitis treatment. Each patient was randomly assigned to receive a gel containing 0.8% HA (Test group), a gel without HA (Placebo group) or no gel treatment (Control group). After a first gel application at baseline, test and placebo patients performed gel applications at home 3 times/day for 45 days. Clinical variables of each implant were recorded at baseline, 45 and 90 days (probing depth, attachment loss, bleeding). Intraoral radiographs of each implants were performed to measure marginal bone level. Peri-implant crevicular fluid was collected from each implant at baseline and after 45 days of treatment, to assess IL-1β and TNFα levels by ELISA technique. Clustering analysis, considering multiple implants within each patient, was performed.
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: