Viewing Study NCT00093158


Ignite Creation Date: 2025-12-25 @ 12:16 AM
Ignite Modification Date: 2026-03-01 @ 6:10 AM
Study NCT ID: NCT00093158
Status: COMPLETED
Last Update Posted: 2007-08-21
First Post: 2004-10-04
Is NOT Gene Therapy: True
Has Adverse Events: False

Brief Title: Comparison of Angiomax Versus Heparin in Acute Coronary Syndromes (ACS)
Sponsor: The Medicines Company
Organization:

Study Overview

Official Title: The ACUITY Trial: A Randomized Comparison of Angiomax (Bivalirudin) Versus Heparin (Unfractionated Heparin or Enoxaparin) in Patients Undergoing Early Invasive Management for Acute Coronary Syndromes Without ST-Segment Elevation
Status: COMPLETED
Status Verified Date: 2007-08
Last Known Status: None
Delayed Posting: No
If Stopped, Why?: Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access: No
If Expanded Access, NCT#: N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status: N/A
Acronym: None
Brief Summary: The purpose of this study is to show that, when compared with heparin (enoxaparin or unfractionated heparin) and routine GPIIb/IIIa inhibition (either started upfront or at the time of percutaneous coronary intervention \[PCI\]; Arm A):

1. Bivalirudin with routine GPIIb/IIIa inhibition (either started upfront or at the time of PCI; Arm B) provides non-inferior or superior overall clinical outcomes and
2. Bivalirudin alone (Arm C) reduces clinically significant bleeding. An important secondary objective for this comparison is to show that bivalirudin is not inferior for ischemic complications.
Detailed Description: None

Study Oversight

Has Oversight DMC:
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
Is an Unapproved Device?:
Is a PPSD?:
Is a US Export?:
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?:

Secondary ID Infos

Secondary ID Type Domain Link View
ACUITY None None View