Viewing Study NCT02277951


Ignite Creation Date: 2025-12-24 @ 11:51 PM
Ignite Modification Date: 2026-02-25 @ 8:25 PM
Study NCT ID: NCT02277951
Status: COMPLETED
Last Update Posted: 2014-10-29
First Post: 2014-10-16
Is NOT Gene Therapy: True
Has Adverse Events: False

Brief Title: Intubation During Resuscitation
Sponsor: International Institute of Rescue Research and Education
Organization:

Study Overview

Official Title: Comparison of Four Types of Laryngoscope for Tracheal Intubation During Chest Compressions
Status: COMPLETED
Status Verified Date: 2014-10
Last Known Status: None
Delayed Posting: No
If Stopped, Why?: Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access: False
If Expanded Access, NCT#: N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status: N/A
Acronym: IDR
Brief Summary: The aim of the study was to compare time and success rates of four intubation devices ( in a cardiopulmonary scenario with uninterrupted chest compressions with a standardized manikin model.

The investigators hypothesized that fiberoscope laryngoscopes may improve success rates.
Detailed Description: Devices using in study:

The Bonfils Intubation Fibrescope (BONFILS)(KARL STORZ Endovision, Inc., Charlton, MA, USA), The Video Rigid Flexing Laryngoscope (RIFL)( AI Medical Devices, Inc., Williamston, MI, USA), The C-MAC® S Video Laryngoscope Blade Mac#3(C-MAC®S) (KARL STORZ Endovision, Inc., Charlton, MA, USA) The Macintosh Laryngoscope Blade no. 3 (MAC) (LifeLine Medical, Inc., Brooksville, FL, USA).

Study Oversight

Has Oversight DMC: False
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?: None
Is a FDA Regulated Device?: None
Is an Unapproved Device?: None
Is a PPSD?: None
Is a US Export?: None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: