Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-24 @ 11:49 PM
Ignite Modification Date:
2026-03-01 @ 12:19 AM
Study NCT ID:
NCT03190551
Status:
COMPLETED
Last Update Posted:
2017-06-19
First Post:
2017-06-12
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
True
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
Retroclavicular Versus Costoclavicular Approach for Infraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block
Sponsor:
Antalya Training and Research Hospital
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Retroclavicular and Costoclavicular Approach for Infraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block
Status:
COMPLETED
Status Verified Date:
2017-06
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
The primary aim of this study is to compare needle shaft visibility between the retroclavicular approach and costoclavicular approach for infraclavicular brachial plexus block in patients undergoing elective upper limb surgery. Secondary aim is to investigate the differences between the two groups in sensorial block success rate, block performance time, block performance related pain, motor block success rate, surgical success rate, complications, patient satisfaction, use of supplemental local anesthetic, use of analgesic.
Detailed Description:
Infraclavicular blocks are performed with different approaches. This study evaluated the effectiveness, safety and feasibility of a retroclavicular brachial plexus block as compared with costoclavicular approach for infraclavicular brachial plexus block. 60 patients scheduled for elective upper limb surgery were recruited and randomized into two groups: Retroclavicular approach for infraclavicular block (Group I), costoclavicular approach for infraclavicular block (Group R). Sensory block, adverse effects and complications were evaluated and recorded every 5 minutes until 30 min after local anesthetic injection. Success rate of each nerve sensory block, complications, rate of satisfaction, rate of failure and incidence rate of adverse effects, the needle shaft visibility, procedure time,duration of the block's effect, use of supplemental local anesthetic, use of analgesic are compared with both groups.
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
None
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: