Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-24 @ 11:35 PM
Ignite Modification Date:
2026-02-25 @ 5:35 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT03835156
Status:
UNKNOWN
Last Update Posted:
2019-03-13
First Post:
2019-01-25
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
True
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
Introducing a New EEG Based Index for Monitoring Recall Under Sedation
Sponsor:
Unity Health Toronto
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
Introducing a New EEG Based Index for Monitoring Recall Under Sedation
Status:
UNKNOWN
Status Verified Date:
2019-03
Last Known Status:
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
This is a single centre prospective observational study that will investigate a new EEG based index in recognizing recall of anesthesia in sedated patients.
Awareness under general anesthesia is a dreadful complication. Various EEG-based technologies (such as BIS and others) were developed in order to identify this condition during anesthesia, using an EEG sticker on the forehead measuring the frontal EEG activity. However, these monitors might be inaccurate due to lack of sensitivity to various hypnotic agents as well as sensitivity to muscle activity, which might lead to report of deep anesthesia in the awake patient. Due to the very low prevalence of awareness under general anesthesia it is difficult to validate or invalidate the effectiveness of these monitors directly. Nevertheless, sedation often involves much greater prevalence of awareness, which permits to evaluate identification of recalled awareness with much humbler sample size.
The current available depth of anesthesia EEG based monitors are not effective in sedated patients since they are susceptible to muscle activity effect, which is present under sedation.
Based on the current literature in the field of electrophysiology the investigators have developed the anterior/ posterior (A/P) index (in the range of 0-100) for appreciating the anesthetic level. It is based on a comparison of anterior brain activity levels to posterior brain activity levels in response to anesthetic medication. The novelty of the index is stem from the fact that it is based on analyzing EEG data from only 4 electrodes covering the frontal and posterior brain activity. The investigators have shown in a proof of concept study performed in Rambam Hospital, Haifa, Israel that this index is not dependent on muscle activity thus is the only index that can identify recall in sedated patients.
Awareness under general anesthesia is a dreadful complication. Various EEG-based technologies (such as BIS and others) were developed in order to identify this condition during anesthesia, using an EEG sticker on the forehead measuring the frontal EEG activity. However, these monitors might be inaccurate due to lack of sensitivity to various hypnotic agents as well as sensitivity to muscle activity, which might lead to report of deep anesthesia in the awake patient. Due to the very low prevalence of awareness under general anesthesia it is difficult to validate or invalidate the effectiveness of these monitors directly. Nevertheless, sedation often involves much greater prevalence of awareness, which permits to evaluate identification of recalled awareness with much humbler sample size.
The current available depth of anesthesia EEG based monitors are not effective in sedated patients since they are susceptible to muscle activity effect, which is present under sedation.
Based on the current literature in the field of electrophysiology the investigators have developed the anterior/ posterior (A/P) index (in the range of 0-100) for appreciating the anesthetic level. It is based on a comparison of anterior brain activity levels to posterior brain activity levels in response to anesthetic medication. The novelty of the index is stem from the fact that it is based on analyzing EEG data from only 4 electrodes covering the frontal and posterior brain activity. The investigators have shown in a proof of concept study performed in Rambam Hospital, Haifa, Israel that this index is not dependent on muscle activity thus is the only index that can identify recall in sedated patients.
Detailed Description:
None
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: