Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-24 @ 10:41 PM
Ignite Modification Date:
2026-01-04 @ 4:41 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT06594835
Status:
COMPLETED
Last Update Posted:
2024-09-19
First Post:
2024-09-03
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
True
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
Test of the Better Together Intervention
Sponsor:
Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
Pilot Test of the Better Together Intervention
Status:
COMPLETED
Status Verified Date:
2024-09
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
BT Pilot
Brief Summary:
Better Together (BT) is a novel, culturally relevant library-based intervention designed to prevent substance use among Black youth (ages 11-13) affected by household challenges (i.e., parental substance use, parental incarceration, and parental mental health challenges). In partnership with public and school librarians, the investigators will conduct a randomized pilot study of BT with up to 100 youth across four sites in Baltimore, Maryland to assess:
1. Implementation fidelity via logs, assessments, and observations of participants and facilitators
2. Feasibility of all key research aspects, including recruitment, randomization, intervention, and control conditions, as well as pre, post, and one-month follow-up assessments
3. Initial effects of BT on substance use
1. Implementation fidelity via logs, assessments, and observations of participants and facilitators
2. Feasibility of all key research aspects, including recruitment, randomization, intervention, and control conditions, as well as pre, post, and one-month follow-up assessments
3. Initial effects of BT on substance use
Detailed Description:
This study occurred from September 2023 through May 2024 in Baltimore, Maryland, USA. The investigators partnered with two schools to assess the feasibility and acceptability of the BT intervention in a small, randomized trial. The investigators compared the outcomes of Black youth (ages 11-13) exposed to household challenges who received the intervention (n = 32) with a time-matched control group of youth exposed to household challenges (n = 27). An online random number generator was used to randomize participants to either the control or intervention group. Randomization occurred at the family level, which allowed all eligible youth from a single family to be in the same condition and minimized the potential for contamination of intervention effects. Participants completed electronic assessments three times: baseline (one week before the start of the intervention), post-test (one week after the intervention), and a 1-month follow-up (one month after the post-test). The trial ended after implementation in two schools at the end of the school year. The investigators obtained approval from the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health Institutional Review Board.
Youth enrollment occurred one month before the start of the intervention. To be eligible, participants had to be between 11 and 13 years old, identify as Black or African American, and have been exposed to one or more household challenges. Direct youth recruitment occurred with study team members inviting families to participate via presentations at each organization. Participants were also recruited indirectly through referrals from organizational staff and enrolled participants. Recruitment materials and presentations did not include information about household challenges as an eligibility criterion to prevent the risk of stigma associated with participating.
Interested youth were required to complete a participant interest form that included their name, as well as their caregiver's name and contact information. A study team member contacted the caregiver to inform them of the study and assist the caregiver in completing a screener to determine the youth's eligibility. A study team member reviewed the purpose and procedures of the study as outlined on the parental permission form. The permission form was emailed and texted to caregivers via Qualtrics to obtain signatures. Once permission was granted, all eligible youth in the family were assigned a participant ID. Oral assent was obtained from all youth before they completed the baseline survey.
Both intervention and control group sessions occurred twice a week, in person, during non-school hours for four weeks. At most, 15 youth were allowed to participate in each group. Sessions were co-facilitated by two study team members. Participants were compensated $25 for each session they attended and each assessment they completed.
Youth enrollment occurred one month before the start of the intervention. To be eligible, participants had to be between 11 and 13 years old, identify as Black or African American, and have been exposed to one or more household challenges. Direct youth recruitment occurred with study team members inviting families to participate via presentations at each organization. Participants were also recruited indirectly through referrals from organizational staff and enrolled participants. Recruitment materials and presentations did not include information about household challenges as an eligibility criterion to prevent the risk of stigma associated with participating.
Interested youth were required to complete a participant interest form that included their name, as well as their caregiver's name and contact information. A study team member contacted the caregiver to inform them of the study and assist the caregiver in completing a screener to determine the youth's eligibility. A study team member reviewed the purpose and procedures of the study as outlined on the parental permission form. The permission form was emailed and texted to caregivers via Qualtrics to obtain signatures. Once permission was granted, all eligible youth in the family were assigned a participant ID. Oral assent was obtained from all youth before they completed the baseline survey.
Both intervention and control group sessions occurred twice a week, in person, during non-school hours for four weeks. At most, 15 youth were allowed to participate in each group. Sessions were co-facilitated by two study team members. Participants were compensated $25 for each session they attended and each assessment they completed.
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
False
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: