Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-24 @ 10:01 PM
Ignite Modification Date:
2026-02-22 @ 7:23 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT02145832
Status:
COMPLETED
Last Update Posted:
2025-09-04
First Post:
2014-05-15
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
True
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
Fluconazole Versus Micafungin in Neonates With Candidiasis
Sponsor:
Institut National de la Santé Et de la Recherche Médicale, France
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
Fluconazole Versus Micafungin in Neonates With Suspected or Culture-proven Candidiasis: a Randomized Pharmacokinetic and Safety Study (TINN Project - Treat Infections iN Neonates)
Status:
COMPLETED
Status Verified Date:
2025-01
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
TINN
Brief Summary:
This study is designed to determine whether micafungin is as efficacious as the current standard of fluconazole, to compare the safety of the two drugs in the treatment of proven neonatal candidiasis.
It is also designed to further elucidate the pharmacokinetics of the two products in the growing and developing neonate and premature infant.
It is also designed to further elucidate the pharmacokinetics of the two products in the growing and developing neonate and premature infant.
Detailed Description:
The epidemiology of candidiasis is rapidly changing; recent estimates are that nearly 50% of Candida bloodstream isolates are non-albicans Candida species requiring the use of treatments active against them.
Because of the high risk associated with candida infection in premature babies and fluconazole prophylaxis is now recommended in Neonatal Intensive Care Units (NICUs) with a high incidence in fungal infections. As candida infection is difficult to prove and requires an urgent treatment, in particular to avoid central nervous system (CNS) infection, treatment is often started in high risk patients when the infection is only suspected, i.e. on clinical arguments without waiting for positive cultures (10% of cases).
Fluconazole has not been approved for use in the treatment of neonatal candidiasis. In contrast, the efficacy of echinocandins for the treatment of invasive candidiasis has been suggested by pre-clinical and clinical studies.
Related to Micafungin, the available data suggest that only dosages that are greater than what currently recommended in infants (2 to 4 mg/kg/day) may ensure adequate coverage of the CNS, given that ability of low dosages of micafungin to penetrate the cerebrospinal compartment and to diffuse in the cerebrospinal fluid is deemed suboptimal.
The doses that will be administered are higher that currently used in order to optimize efficacy, and the concept of a loading dose that will be used for both drugs in this project, is present in antifungal treatment strategies for adults, but it has never been applied to infants and preterm neonates.
Because of the high risk associated with candida infection in premature babies and fluconazole prophylaxis is now recommended in Neonatal Intensive Care Units (NICUs) with a high incidence in fungal infections. As candida infection is difficult to prove and requires an urgent treatment, in particular to avoid central nervous system (CNS) infection, treatment is often started in high risk patients when the infection is only suspected, i.e. on clinical arguments without waiting for positive cultures (10% of cases).
Fluconazole has not been approved for use in the treatment of neonatal candidiasis. In contrast, the efficacy of echinocandins for the treatment of invasive candidiasis has been suggested by pre-clinical and clinical studies.
Related to Micafungin, the available data suggest that only dosages that are greater than what currently recommended in infants (2 to 4 mg/kg/day) may ensure adequate coverage of the CNS, given that ability of low dosages of micafungin to penetrate the cerebrospinal compartment and to diffuse in the cerebrospinal fluid is deemed suboptimal.
The doses that will be administered are higher that currently used in order to optimize efficacy, and the concept of a loading dose that will be used for both drugs in this project, is present in antifungal treatment strategies for adults, but it has never been applied to infants and preterm neonates.
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
True
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
None
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?:
Secondary ID Infos
| Secondary ID | Type | Domain | Link | View |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012-001916-41 | EUDRACT_NUMBER | None | View |