Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-24 @ 7:57 PM
Ignite Modification Date:
2026-03-05 @ 11:02 AM
Study NCT ID:
NCT02238704
Status:
COMPLETED
Last Update Posted:
2016-07-27
First Post:
2014-09-05
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
True
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
Cornell University-Micronutrient Initiative Calcium Supplementation Study
Sponsor:
Cornell University
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
A Cluster-randomized, Non-inferiority Open-label Trial of the Impact of Supplementation Regimen on Consumption of Prenatal Calcium and Iron/Folic Acid Supplements and Adherence to Related Recommendations
Status:
COMPLETED
Status Verified Date:
2016-07
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
MICA
Brief Summary:
The World Health Organization (WHO) now recommends prenatal calcium supplementation for prevention of preeclampsia in populations with inadequate dietary intake. This study seeks to compare the effect of two dosing strategies on the amount of supplement ingested by pregnant women and adherence to related recommendations.
Detailed Description:
This study is a non-inferiority trial that compares the effect of a dosing strategy involving lower overall dose and fewer administrations per day to the current WHO recommendation. The comparator arm, Regimen B, prescribes 3 doses per day (consistent with current WHO standard) and was found to be burdensome in qualitative studies. The experimental arm, Regimen A, prescribes 2 doses per day and has been associated with greater satisfaction. On face value Regimen A should result in 33% less amount of supplement ingested than Regimen B. However, we hypothesize that the difference in amount ingested, when rolled out in routine practice will be MUCH LESS than that BECAUSE THE LOWER DOSE REGIMEN RESULTS IN HIGHER LEVELS OF ADHERENCE. We hypothesize that THE DIFFERENCE IN AMOUNT CONSUMED WILL BE NEGLIGIBLE OR will not exceed 15%. Hence, we hypothesize that Regimen A is not inferior to Regimen B in terms of total amount of supplement ingested (within a 15% margin of inferiority).
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
None
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?:
Secondary ID Infos
| Secondary ID | Type | Domain | Link | View |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| P414/01/2013 | OTHER | Kenyatta National Hospital Ethics Review Committee | View |