Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-24 @ 7:19 PM
Ignite Modification Date:
2026-03-27 @ 8:50 AM
Study NCT ID:
NCT03931603
Status:
COMPLETED
Last Update Posted:
2019-04-30
First Post:
2018-11-15
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
True
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
Endometriosis of the Recto-sigmoid: MRI (Magnetic Resonance Imaging) Criteria Predictive of Shaving or Segmental Resection
Sponsor:
Hospices Civils de Lyon
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
Endometriosis of the Recto-sigmoid: MRI Criteria Predictive of Shaving or Segmental Resection
Status:
COMPLETED
Status Verified Date:
2019-04
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
Evaluate MRI criteria predictive of the type of surgery to be performed for an "in sano" resection of endometriotic involvement of the recto-sigmoid by a resection without opening of the rectal mucosa ("shaving") versus a segmental resection.
Detailed Description:
PURPOSE: To retrospectively determine the accuracy of MRI rectal and pararectal signs in predicting a segmental resection of lesions located in the rectum until the recto-sigmoid junction.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Institutional review board approval for this study was obtained and waived written informed consent. The MR images of 61 patients treated for rectal endometriosis over a 6 years period were reviewed. Two blinded readers performed in consensus a systematic analysis of 7 rectal (length, transverse axis, thickness and circumference of the lesion, and presence of a convex base, submucosal edema and hyperintense cystic areas) and 4 pararectal (posterior vaginal fornix, parametrial, ureteral and sacro-recto-genital septum involvements) signs for each lesion. MR imaging results were compared with surgical procedure (shaving versus segmental resection). Efficacy parameters were calculated with 95 % confidence intervals (CIs).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Institutional review board approval for this study was obtained and waived written informed consent. The MR images of 61 patients treated for rectal endometriosis over a 6 years period were reviewed. Two blinded readers performed in consensus a systematic analysis of 7 rectal (length, transverse axis, thickness and circumference of the lesion, and presence of a convex base, submucosal edema and hyperintense cystic areas) and 4 pararectal (posterior vaginal fornix, parametrial, ureteral and sacro-recto-genital septum involvements) signs for each lesion. MR imaging results were compared with surgical procedure (shaving versus segmental resection). Efficacy parameters were calculated with 95 % confidence intervals (CIs).
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: