Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-24 @ 7:06 PM
Ignite Modification Date:
2026-01-03 @ 9:15 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT02590757
Status:
COMPLETED
Last Update Posted:
2021-12-07
First Post:
2015-10-25
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
True
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
Comparison of NIV-NAVA vs. N-CPAP After Extubation in Preterm Infants Study
Sponsor:
Seoul National University Hospital
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
Comparison of Non-invasive Ventilation Neurally Adjusted Ventilatory Assist vs. Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure After Extubation in Infants' < 30 Weeks of Gestation: Randomized Controlled Study
Status:
COMPLETED
Status Verified Date:
2021-12
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
This study is a randomized controlled study to compare if a a non-invasive neurally adjusted ventilatory assist (NIV-NAVA) is better than nasal continuous positive airway pressure (N-CPAP) after extubation in infants' \< 30 weeks of gestation.
Detailed Description:
None
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
True
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
None
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: