Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-24 @ 5:58 PM
Ignite Modification Date:
2026-02-20 @ 4:31 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT02304068
Status:
COMPLETED
Last Update Posted:
2019-08-20
First Post:
2014-11-04
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
True
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
The Accuracy of Home Monitoring for Acute Macular Degeneration (AMD) Disease Activity
Sponsor:
The Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
The Accuracy of Home Monitoring for Disease Activity During Maintenance Therapy for Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration
Status:
COMPLETED
Status Verified Date:
2019-08
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
Currently the best treatment for "wet" macular degeneration involves regular injections of Ranibizumab (Lucentis). In the initial clinical trials, the drug was injected into the eye every month. Since then a number of studies have found similar benefits when the drug is given with a fixed number of injections initially and then with further injections only when needed. This approach has been adopted in the UK, following recommendation by the National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE).
Although this approach reduces the expense and risk of un-necessary treatment, it does require regular hospital assessment of disease activity to determine if a repeat injection is required or can be deferred. The hospital assessment is time-consuming, inconvenient and the large number of assessments can cause delays in hospital follow-up.
Using three different assessment criteria to monitor disease activity at home, the investigators plan to see if home monitoring is as good as hospital assessment. The investigators have already identified that many patients dislike the lengthy hospital assessment visit and would welcome the opportunity to do some of the monitoring of disease activity at home. The investigators have also shown that they understand and can complete each of the home assessment tests. In this pilot project, the investigators aim to get an idea of how reliable home monitoring can be in a small sample of just over 30 patients. The data that the pilot project generates will be used to influence and to help plan a subsequent, larger, national study to be submitted for funding to the National Institute for Health Research.
Although this approach reduces the expense and risk of un-necessary treatment, it does require regular hospital assessment of disease activity to determine if a repeat injection is required or can be deferred. The hospital assessment is time-consuming, inconvenient and the large number of assessments can cause delays in hospital follow-up.
Using three different assessment criteria to monitor disease activity at home, the investigators plan to see if home monitoring is as good as hospital assessment. The investigators have already identified that many patients dislike the lengthy hospital assessment visit and would welcome the opportunity to do some of the monitoring of disease activity at home. The investigators have also shown that they understand and can complete each of the home assessment tests. In this pilot project, the investigators aim to get an idea of how reliable home monitoring can be in a small sample of just over 30 patients. The data that the pilot project generates will be used to influence and to help plan a subsequent, larger, national study to be submitted for funding to the National Institute for Health Research.
Detailed Description:
None
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
Is an Unapproved Device?:
Is a PPSD?:
Is a US Export?:
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?:
Secondary ID Infos
| Secondary ID | Type | Domain | Link | View |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12/YH/0195 | OTHER | Research Ethics Committee | View |