Viewing Study NCT02996968


Ignite Creation Date: 2025-12-24 @ 5:47 PM
Ignite Modification Date: 2026-01-04 @ 2:36 PM
Study NCT ID: NCT02996968
Status: COMPLETED
Last Update Posted: 2019-11-12
First Post: 2016-12-15
Is NOT Gene Therapy: True
Has Adverse Events: True

Brief Title: Self-discontinuation of a Transurethral Catheter
Sponsor: TriHealth Inc.
Organization:

Study Overview

Official Title: Is Self-discontinuation of a Transurethral Catheter Following Pelvic Reconstructive Surgery as Effective as Office-based Discontinuation?; A Randomized Controlled Trial
Status: COMPLETED
Status Verified Date: 2019-03
Last Known Status: None
Delayed Posting: No
If Stopped, Why?: Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access: False
If Expanded Access, NCT#: N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status: N/A
Acronym: None
Brief Summary: This study is to determine if self-discontinuation of transurethral foley catheters in patients diagnosed with postoperative urinary retention (POUR), which is defined as the continued need for catheterization, following impatient pelvic organ prolapse surgery is non-inferior to office-discontinuation.
Detailed Description: Postoperative urinary retention (POUR) is a common issue following urogynecologic surgery, with incidence rates of 1.4-43%. The wide range of incidence is due to the lack of a standardized definition of POUR. Generally speaking, POUR can be characterized by any impairment in bladder emptying following surgery. While the gold standard for assessing voiding function remains measurement of a postvoid residual (PVR), there are many voiding trial (VT) methods being used across institutions.

Historically, the most widely accepted postoperative VT for the assessment of voiding function was the backfill method. An alternative assessment of voiding function is the spontaneous VT, where the indwelling catheter is removed and a patient is asked to void spontaneously when a patient has the urge. It is controversial which of these methods are superior, and studies are conflicted. Nevertheless, both of these methods were studied in a clinical setting, and we lack information on self-discontinuation efficacy at home.

Managing an indwelling urinary catheter and returning to the outpatient clinic only a week after discharge from the hospital can be overwhelming for patients and their involved caregivers. Given the low incidence of POUR at one-week postoperative and patient dissatisfaction with urinary catheter management, home self-removal of indwelling urinary catheters is an important topic of investigation.

We are trying to compare the incidence of POUR between self-discontinuation and office-discontinuation of urinary catheters. The results of this study could impact on the decision regarding catheter use following inpatient pelvic organ prolapse surgery.

Study Oversight

Has Oversight DMC: False
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?: None
Is a FDA Regulated Device?: None
Is an Unapproved Device?: None
Is a PPSD?: None
Is a US Export?: None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: