Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-24 @ 5:25 PM
Ignite Modification Date:
2026-01-03 @ 9:16 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT06687668
Status:
COMPLETED
Last Update Posted:
2025-06-24
First Post:
2024-11-12
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
True
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
Short Leg Walking Plaster Cast Versus Walking Foot Cast for Jones Fracture
Sponsor:
Khyber Medical University Peshawar
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
Short Leg Walking Plaster Cast Versus Walking Foot Cast for Jones Fracture: An Open Label Randomized Controlled Trial.
Status:
COMPLETED
Status Verified Date:
2025-06
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
This study is an open-label, randomized controlled trial comparing the effectiveness of two plaster cast methods-Short Leg Walking Plaster Cast and Walking Foot Plaster Cast-for treating Jones fractures, a common fracture at the base of the fifth metatarsal in the foot. This trial will be conducted at Lady Reading Hospital Peshawar. The study will evaluate differences in fracture healing and functional outcomes between these two treatment approaches. Findings from this trial may guide more evidence-based treatment protocols for Jones fractures, potentially improving patient mobility and recovery without requiring surgical intervention.
Detailed Description:
Jones fractures represent 26.3% of fractures at the base of the fifth metatarsal and are commonly treated conservatively through various weight-bearing casts. The lack of consensus on the optimal casting method for Jones fractures necessitates further study, particularly given the absence of published guidelines. This trial, unique in its randomized and prospective approach within Pakistan, aims to compare Short Leg Walking Plaster Casts and Walking Foot Plaster Casts specifically for Jones fractures.
Patients meeting the inclusion criteria will be randomly assigned to one of the two treatment groups, with the primary endpoints being fracture healing (union) and functional outcomes at six weeks, assessed via radiographs and the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Score (AOFAS). This study seeks to produce robust evidence to inform treatment guidelines, allowing patients, especially in low- and middle-income settings, to continue daily activities with minimal disruption during recovery.
Patients meeting the inclusion criteria will be randomly assigned to one of the two treatment groups, with the primary endpoints being fracture healing (union) and functional outcomes at six weeks, assessed via radiographs and the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Score (AOFAS). This study seeks to produce robust evidence to inform treatment guidelines, allowing patients, especially in low- and middle-income settings, to continue daily activities with minimal disruption during recovery.
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
True
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: