Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-24 @ 11:47 AM
Ignite Modification Date:
2026-02-07 @ 12:17 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT07060261
Status:
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Last Update Posted:
2025-10-09
First Post:
2025-06-23
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
True
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
Pre-Op MRI on Margin Status for Transoral Robotic Surgery for HPV+ Tonsillar Squamous Cell Carcinoma
Sponsor:
Case Comprehensive Cancer Center
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
Prospective Evaluation of Pre-Operative MRI on Margin Status for Transoral Robotic Surgery for HPV+ Tonsillar Squamous Cell Carcinoma
Status:
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Status Verified Date:
2025-07
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
This prospective research study aims to see if pre-operative MRI can predict the margin status after transoral robotic surgery (TORS) for human papillomavirus positive (HPV+) tonsillar squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). The pre-operative MRI will have a standard MR neck without and with contrast, with added axial T2 weighted sequence and T2 SPACE sequence through the tonsils. Three neuroradiologists will grade the thickness of the pharyngeal constrictor muscle (the muscle that surrounds the tonsils) on a five-point scale. The study will determine if the pre-operative MRI grading will correlate with positive, insecure (\<1mm), or secure (\>1mm) margin during TORS surgery for your HPV+ tonsillar SCC.
Detailed Description:
There has been a marked increase in the incidence on oropharyngeal SCC in recent decades because of the rise of HPV+ disease1-3. Stage I or II tonsillar SCC can be treated by either surgery or radiation with similar good outcomes. For tumors treated surgically, transoral robotic surgery has replaced open surgery due to decreased morbidity and improved local control. It has been shown that margin status of 1.1mm of healthy tissue around the tumor is sufficient for adequate local control. However, approximately 8.1% of the time there is a positive or insecure margin, resulting in added adjuvant radiation and possibly chemotherapy, with increasing morbidity for each added treatment modality.
Therefore, there is a need to determine pre-operatively the chance of positive or insecure margin at surgery to avoid increased morbidity with added adjuvant treatment. Currently, the most commonly used imaging modality is computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), but this is to rule out absolute contraindications such as internal carotid artery encasement, involvement of the mandibular periosteum, prevertebral fascia/musculature, or masticator space musculature. Recently, a retrospective study used a novel five-point grading scale (1, normal constrictor; 2, bulging constrictor; 3, thinning constrictor; 4, obscured constrictor; and 5, tumor protrusion into the parapharyngeal fat) to evaluate the pharyngeal constrictor muscle, showing that higher scores with obscured constrictor or tumor protrusion into the parapharyngeal fat resulted in increased risk of positive or insecure margin. Given this, there is need for a prospective study to estimate the accuracy of the five-point MRI score with respect to distinguishing patients who go onto have secure surgical margins versus patients who go on to have insecure/positive surgical margins including surgical report of violation of anatomic boundaries (pharyngeal constrictor muscle)
Therefore, there is a need to determine pre-operatively the chance of positive or insecure margin at surgery to avoid increased morbidity with added adjuvant treatment. Currently, the most commonly used imaging modality is computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), but this is to rule out absolute contraindications such as internal carotid artery encasement, involvement of the mandibular periosteum, prevertebral fascia/musculature, or masticator space musculature. Recently, a retrospective study used a novel five-point grading scale (1, normal constrictor; 2, bulging constrictor; 3, thinning constrictor; 4, obscured constrictor; and 5, tumor protrusion into the parapharyngeal fat) to evaluate the pharyngeal constrictor muscle, showing that higher scores with obscured constrictor or tumor protrusion into the parapharyngeal fat resulted in increased risk of positive or insecure margin. Given this, there is need for a prospective study to estimate the accuracy of the five-point MRI score with respect to distinguishing patients who go onto have secure surgical margins versus patients who go on to have insecure/positive surgical margins including surgical report of violation of anatomic boundaries (pharyngeal constrictor muscle)
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: