Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-24 @ 3:31 PM
Ignite Modification Date:
2026-02-25 @ 2:34 AM
Study NCT ID:
NCT06753292
Status:
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Last Update Posted:
2024-12-31
First Post:
2024-12-22
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
True
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
The Influence of Combining the Pulmonary Recruitment Maneuver with Active Gas Aspiration on Post-laparoscopic Shoulder Pain in Patients Having a Gynecologic Laparoscopy, Randomized Double Blinded Clinical Trial
Sponsor:
Assiut University
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
The Influence of Combining the Pulmonary Recruitment Maneuver with Active Gas Aspiration on Post-laparoscopic Shoulder Pain in Patients Having a Gynecologic Laparoscopy, Randomized Double Blinded Clinical Trial
Status:
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Status Verified Date:
2024-12
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
Laparoscopy is among the most used minimally invasive procedures that can reduce postoperative pain, lessen the duration of hospital stay and facilitate recovery. Laparoscopy has been widely used in various abdominal surgeries, such as gastrectomy, cholecystectomy, appendectomy, hernia and gynecological surgery . However, the post-laparoscopic shoulder pain (PLSP) often occurs following laparoscopic surgeries, and its reported incidence varies from 35-80% This study aims to assess the effect of combining pulmonary recruitment maneuvers (PRM) with active gas aspiration on post-laparoscopic shoulder pain in patients undergoing gynecological laparoscopic procedures.
Detailed Description:
The PLSP can even remain for up to three days and often upsets the patients . Moreover, it can increase the costs of healthcare owing to an increased usage of analgesics, delayed discharge, and even re-admission .
Therefore, necessary measures should be taken to diminish the intensity of PLSP. Although the exact mechanism of PLSP remains unclear, some studies have suggested that it is caused by the trapping of carbon dioxide (CO2) between the liver and the right diaphragm and subsequent conversion into carbonic acid, which irritates the diaphragm and subsequently generates referred shoulder pain (C4 dermatomal) . Therefore, several studies have attempted to decrease the incidence or severity of PLSP by promoting the removal of remaining CO2 from the abdominal cavity. These efforts include drainage tube insertion, intraperitoneal saline instillation (IPSI), and the usage of intraperitoneal local anesthetic agents . More-over, the pulmonary recruitment maneuver (PRM) can also facilitate the removal of CO2 from the abdominal cavity by increasing positive airway pressure and intrathoracic pressure. PRM is more commonly used in clinical practice because it does not require drugs, specialized apparatus, or additional medical costs, unlike the other methods . Several trials have described the advantages of PRM in patients undergoing laparoscopic operations compared to passive abdominal compression.
Therefore, necessary measures should be taken to diminish the intensity of PLSP. Although the exact mechanism of PLSP remains unclear, some studies have suggested that it is caused by the trapping of carbon dioxide (CO2) between the liver and the right diaphragm and subsequent conversion into carbonic acid, which irritates the diaphragm and subsequently generates referred shoulder pain (C4 dermatomal) . Therefore, several studies have attempted to decrease the incidence or severity of PLSP by promoting the removal of remaining CO2 from the abdominal cavity. These efforts include drainage tube insertion, intraperitoneal saline instillation (IPSI), and the usage of intraperitoneal local anesthetic agents . More-over, the pulmonary recruitment maneuver (PRM) can also facilitate the removal of CO2 from the abdominal cavity by increasing positive airway pressure and intrathoracic pressure. PRM is more commonly used in clinical practice because it does not require drugs, specialized apparatus, or additional medical costs, unlike the other methods . Several trials have described the advantages of PRM in patients undergoing laparoscopic operations compared to passive abdominal compression.
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
True
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: