Viewing Study NCT05296759


Ignite Creation Date: 2025-12-24 @ 2:53 PM
Ignite Modification Date: 2026-01-04 @ 8:55 AM
Study NCT ID: NCT05296759
Status: COMPLETED
Last Update Posted: 2022-04-06
First Post: 2022-03-08
Is NOT Gene Therapy: True
Has Adverse Events: False

Brief Title: Botulinum Toxin Type A in Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy
Sponsor: Alexandria University
Organization:

Study Overview

Official Title: A Comparative Study Of Botulinum Toxin Type A Versus Conventional Oral Therapy As A Second Line Treatment Of Diabetic Neuropathy
Status: COMPLETED
Status Verified Date: 2022-03
Last Known Status: None
Delayed Posting: No
If Stopped, Why?: Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access: False
If Expanded Access, NCT#: N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status: N/A
Acronym: None
Brief Summary: Background: Diabetes mellitus is commonly complicated by diabetic peripheral neuropathy. Due to common side effects and poor tolerance to medication, poor adherence to medication is common in diabetic peripheral neuropathy. Botulinum toxin A intradermal injection has proved efficacy in cases of diabetic peripheral neuropathy however there is a need to compare its effect with other lines of treatment. The aim of the study was to compare botulinum toxin type a verses conventional oral treatment as a second line treatment of painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy. This study was conducted as a comparative study on 30 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus proved by nerve conduction study on carbamazepine. Patients were divided randomly into 3 groups. First group was add on duloxetine, second was add on gabapentin and the third group was injected intradermal with botulinum toxin A.
Detailed Description: This study is a comparative study on 30 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus proved by nerve conduction study on carbamazepine. Patients were divided randomly into 3 groups.

First group was add on duloxetine, second was add on gabapentin and the third group was injected intradermal with Botulinum toxin A. Base line Assessment before treatment and follow up assessment as performed The treatment options were explained to the patients and the choice of Botulinum toxin A Intradermal injection was the patient own decision based on inability to be tolerate or adhere to oral treatment.

Study Oversight

Has Oversight DMC: True
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?: False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?: False
Is an Unapproved Device?: None
Is a PPSD?: None
Is a US Export?: None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: