Viewing Study NCT01556659


Ignite Creation Date: 2025-12-24 @ 2:51 PM
Ignite Modification Date: 2026-02-25 @ 4:15 AM
Study NCT ID: NCT01556659
Status: TERMINATED
Last Update Posted: 2024-04-25
First Post: 2012-03-12
Is NOT Gene Therapy: True
Has Adverse Events: False

Brief Title: LV Thrombus After Acute AMI: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Sponsor: Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA)
Organization:

Study Overview

Official Title: Left Ventricular Thrombus Formation After Acute Myocardial Infarction - a Randomized Multi-center Trial Comparing Two Different Anti-thrombotic Regimens
Status: TERMINATED
Status Verified Date: 2024-04
Last Known Status: None
Delayed Posting: No
If Stopped, Why?: Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access: False
If Expanded Access, NCT#: N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status: N/A
Acronym: None
Brief Summary: Left Ventricular (LV) thrombus formation is witnessed in at least 10% of patients with ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). It is a feared complication since it might increase the risk of thrombo-embolic events, including stroke. Guidelines recommend vitamin K antagonist treatment in these patients. However patients with STEMI nowadays undergo primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with coronary stent placement and consequently require dual anti-platelet therapy (ascal and P2Y12 inhibitors) to prevent stent thrombosis. Consequently, STEMI patients with LV thrombus are currently treated with triple antithrombotic therapy (aspirin, P2Y12 inhibitors, e.g. clopidogrel (75 mg/d) and vitamin K antagonist). Patients treated with triple antithrombotic therapy are subject to a strongly increased bleeding risk with a yearly incidence of 3.7% for dual anti-platelet therapy as compared to 12% for triple antithrombotic therapy. About 10% of these bleedings are cerebral. The mortality of such haemorrhagic strokes is 25%. A recent retrospective analysis did not show any beneficial effects of addition of vitamin K antagonist to dual anti-platelet therapy to prevent stroke. If vitamin K antagonist-therapy could be omitted, morbidity and mortality due to post-PCI bleedings will decrease. Therefore, a randomized trial is warranted to address this issue.

Design: A multicenter, prospective, randomized, two non-inferiority trial. The objective of the study is to determine in a randomized fashion the risks and benefits of the addition of vitamin K antagonists to dual anti-platelet therapy or dual anti-platelet therapy in patients with PCI-treated STEMI and LV thrombus formation on baseline echocardiography or baseline Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI).
Detailed Description: Design: A multicenter, prospective, randomized, non-inferiority trial with blinded evaluation of endpoints

Objective: The objective of this study is to determine in a randomized fashion the risks as well as the benefits of the addition of vitamin K antagonists to dual anti-platelet therapy in patients with PCI-treated STEMI and LV thrombus formation

Patients: Patients with acute myocardial infarction treated with primary PCI and LV thrombus on baseline echocardiography or baseline Magnetic Resonance Imaging. (MRI)

Methods: After written informed consent has been obtained, echocardiography and MRI are performed between 7-12 days after PCI. When LV thrombus is present on baseline MRI, patients are randomized to

1. Triple antithrombotic therapy (aspirin (100 mg/d), thienopyridine class antiplatelet agent,) and vitamin K antagonist (goal INR is 2.0 to 3.0))
2. Dual anti-platelet therapy (aspirin (100mg/d) and thienopyridine class antiplatelet agent, e.g. clopidogrel (75 mg/d).

Primary Endpoint: Primary outcome is defined as the proportions of patients with new cerebral micro-infarcts at 6 months relative to baseline measured by MRI.

Secondary Endpoints: The secondary endpoints as assessed at 6 and 12 months are:

* the composite of vascular death, recurrent myocardial infarction, stroke or systemic embolism
* presence of new cerebral mirco-bleeds
* the occurrence of major and minor bleeding
* neurological status and quality of life.

Study Oversight

Has Oversight DMC: True
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?: None
Is a FDA Regulated Device?: None
Is an Unapproved Device?: None
Is a PPSD?: None
Is a US Export?: None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: