Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-25 @ 4:11 AM
Ignite Modification Date:
2026-03-03 @ 12:03 AM
Study NCT ID:
NCT01075620
Status:
COMPLETED
Last Update Posted:
2010-02-25
First Post:
2010-02-16
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
True
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
Comparison of Nonposterior- and Posterior-Stabilized Mobile-Bearing Total Knee Arthroplasty
Sponsor:
Ewha Womans University
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
Comparison of Nonposterior- and Posterior-Stabilized Mobile-Bearing Total Knee Arthroplasty A Prospective, Randomized Study
Status:
COMPLETED
Status Verified Date:
2010-01
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
The purpose of this study is to determine if there are any clinical or radiographic differences in non-posterior stabilized rotating mobile bearing design versus a posterior stabilized rotating mobile bearing designs.
Detailed Description:
Out comes measures were to determine
1. whether the knee and function scores and the radiographic results of the knees with a PFC Sigma RP knee prosthesis would be better than those with an LCS RP prosthesis.
2. whether the patients with a PFC RP knee prosthesis would have a better range of knee motion than those with an LCS RP prosthesis.
3. whether patient satisfaction and preference would be better in the patients having a PFC Sigma RP knee prosthesis than those of patients having an LCS RP knee prosthesis
4. whether complication rate would be less in the knees with a PFC sigma RP knee prosthesis than in the knees with an LCS RP prosthesis.
1. whether the knee and function scores and the radiographic results of the knees with a PFC Sigma RP knee prosthesis would be better than those with an LCS RP prosthesis.
2. whether the patients with a PFC RP knee prosthesis would have a better range of knee motion than those with an LCS RP prosthesis.
3. whether patient satisfaction and preference would be better in the patients having a PFC Sigma RP knee prosthesis than those of patients having an LCS RP knee prosthesis
4. whether complication rate would be less in the knees with a PFC sigma RP knee prosthesis than in the knees with an LCS RP prosthesis.
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
True
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
None
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: