Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-25 @ 3:30 AM
Ignite Modification Date:
2026-03-01 @ 4:12 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT04263805
Status:
UNKNOWN
Last Update Posted:
2020-02-11
First Post:
2020-02-07
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
True
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
A Vignette-based Randomized Controlled Trial to Evaluate the Impact of Research Climate on Research Practices of Doctoral Students
Sponsor:
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
A Vignette-based Randomized Controlled Trial to Evaluate the Impact of Research Climate on Research Practices of Doctoral Students Facing Dilemma Situations
Status:
UNKNOWN
Status Verified Date:
2020-01
Last Known Status:
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
This study aims to evaluate the impact of research climate on PhD students' research practice (i.e., an environment where their peer (i.e., a post-doc researcher) had detrimental practice in a similar situation)
Detailed Description:
PhD students are the next generation of researchers and will present the field in the future. However, several environmental factors might influence their research practice. In this study, the investigators will evaluate the impact of research climate on PhD students' research practice (exposure to an environment where their peers commit a detrimental practice).
Objective: To evaluate the impact of research climate on PhD students' research practice
Design: A randomized controlled trial
1. Intervention: Participants will be shown two case vignettes describing dilemma situations in research reported with and without research climate factor.
2. Participants: The participants will be PhD students in all biomedical disciplines.
3. Sample size will be 300 participants
4. Primary outcome: In each vignette, participants will have to indicate which solution they prefer on a semantic differential scale, rated from - 5 to -1 (preference for solution A) and from 1 to 5 (preference for solution B). Participants will be forced to make a choice between the 2 solutions. The primary outcome will be the mean preference score.
5. This study is approved by ethics review regulations by INSERM (CEEI-IRB): IRB00003888
Objective: To evaluate the impact of research climate on PhD students' research practice
Design: A randomized controlled trial
1. Intervention: Participants will be shown two case vignettes describing dilemma situations in research reported with and without research climate factor.
2. Participants: The participants will be PhD students in all biomedical disciplines.
3. Sample size will be 300 participants
4. Primary outcome: In each vignette, participants will have to indicate which solution they prefer on a semantic differential scale, rated from - 5 to -1 (preference for solution A) and from 1 to 5 (preference for solution B). Participants will be forced to make a choice between the 2 solutions. The primary outcome will be the mean preference score.
5. This study is approved by ethics review regulations by INSERM (CEEI-IRB): IRB00003888
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: