Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-25 @ 3:29 AM
Ignite Modification Date:
2026-01-04 @ 12:09 AM
Study NCT ID:
NCT05913505
Status:
UNKNOWN
Last Update Posted:
2023-06-22
First Post:
2023-04-02
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
True
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
Heart Rate Variability Biofeedback Following Traumatic Brain Injury
Sponsor:
Brigham Young University
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
A Randomized Controlled Trial of Heart Rate Variability Biofeedback Following Traumatic Brain Injury
Status:
UNKNOWN
Status Verified Date:
2023-06
Last Known Status:
RECRUITING
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
Individuals with mild traumatic brain injury will be randomly assigned to an active heart rate variability biofeedback condition and a sham condition. The investigators will use a randomized pre-post design that will consist of two data collection phases and a 5-week treatment condition. The heart rate variability biofeedback active condition is designed to increase heart rate oscillations (Osc+ condition) consistent with current best practices, while the sham control heart rate variability biofeedback condition is designed to decrease heart rate oscillations (Osc- condition).
Detailed Description:
There are two primary aims of the study: (1) examine whether heart rate variability increases at rest in individuals with mild traumatic brain injury from pre-treatment to post-treatment following heart rate variability biofeedback; (2) to test whether heart rate variability recovery following a stressor improves in individuals with mild traumatic brain injury following heart rate variability biofeedback. Regarding the first primary aim, the investigators hypothesize that heart rate variability will be higher in individuals with mild traumatic brain injury following heart rate variability biofeedback compared to those in the control/sham condition where the investigators do not expect such improvement pre- to post-testing. For the second aim, consistent with previous work, the investigators hypothesize that heart rate variability recovery following a stressor will be faster in individuals with mild traumatic brain injury following heart rate variability biofeedback compared to a sham control condition. There are three secondary aims for this study: (1) to evaluate whether improvements in heart rate variability in individuals with mild traumatic brain injury following heart rate variability biofeedback are associated with improvements in physical symptoms common after head injury (i.e., headaches, dizziness, sleep disturbance); (2) to evaluate whether improvements in heart rate variability in individuals with mild traumatic brain injury following heart rate variability biofeedback are associated with improvements in emotional functioning (i.e., life satisfaction, anxiety symptoms, depression symptoms); and (3) to evaluate whether improvements in heart rate variability in individuals with mild traumatic brain injury following heart rate variability biofeedback are associated with improvements in cognitive functioning (i.e., attention, inhibitory control).
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: