Viewing Study NCT02694705


Ignite Creation Date: 2025-12-25 @ 3:20 AM
Ignite Modification Date: 2026-03-03 @ 2:57 PM
Study NCT ID: NCT02694705
Status: COMPLETED
Last Update Posted: 2016-09-30
First Post: 2016-02-24
Is NOT Gene Therapy: True
Has Adverse Events: False

Brief Title: Assessment of Preoxygenation Strategies in the Prehospital Environment
Sponsor: Queen Mary University of London
Organization:

Study Overview

Official Title: Assessment of Preoxygenation Strategies in the Prehospital Environment
Status: COMPLETED
Status Verified Date: 2016-09
Last Known Status: None
Delayed Posting: No
If Stopped, Why?: Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access: False
If Expanded Access, NCT#: N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status: N/A
Acronym: None
Brief Summary: Comparison of the preoxygenation efficacy of tidal volume breathing using three different preoxygenation techniques which are available to providers in the prehospital environment.
Detailed Description: Prospective randomised interventional study.

Healthy volunteers will be positioned supine and undergo preoxygenation by tidal volume breathing for 3 minutes using each technique in turn. The sequence of techniques for each volunteer will be randomised in advance. Investigators will be instructed to ensure a good mask seal throughout the testing period. At the end of a 3 minute preoxygenation period, after a brief breath hold, the volunteer will exhale into reservoir tubing, allowing the fractional expired oxygen concentration (FeO2) to be determined (primary outcome) using a calibrated gas analyser.

The techniques being assessed have been chosen from methods of preoxygenation commonly available to clinicians in the prehospital environment:

1. Continuous Positive Airway Pressure mode with fractional inspired oxygen concentration (FiO2) 100% using a portable ventilator.
2. Bag-valve-mask device (BVM) with 15 l/min oxygen flow.
3. Non-rebreather mask (NRM) device with 15 l/min oxygen flow.

Volunteers will also be asked to indicate the subjective ease of breathing for each technique (secondary outcome) using a visual analogue scale (VAS).

Study Oversight

Has Oversight DMC: False
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?: None
Is a FDA Regulated Device?: None
Is an Unapproved Device?: None
Is a PPSD?: None
Is a US Export?: None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: