Viewing Study NCT02000505


Ignite Creation Date: 2025-12-25 @ 3:13 AM
Ignite Modification Date: 2026-02-21 @ 8:11 PM
Study NCT ID: NCT02000505
Status: UNKNOWN
Last Update Posted: 2015-05-05
First Post: 2013-11-17
Is NOT Gene Therapy: True
Has Adverse Events: False

Brief Title: Comparison of the Quality of CPR by Lay Rescuers With and Without Feedback Devices
Sponsor: University Hospital of Cologne
Organization:

Study Overview

Official Title: Comparison of the Quality of CPR by Lay Rescuers With and Without Telephone Instructions by a Simulated Rescue Coordination Center
Status: UNKNOWN
Status Verified Date: 2015-05
Last Known Status: RECRUITING
Delayed Posting: No
If Stopped, Why?: Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access: False
If Expanded Access, NCT#: N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status: N/A
Acronym: frequenz
Brief Summary: Comparison of various methods to improve the quality of CPR
Detailed Description: Even for paramedics and emergency physicians, the resuscitation of patients with cardiac arrest remains a challenge. Previous studies have shown that the cardiac output varies widely even among professional helpers. This is especially due to some very different mean frequencies of cardiac compression wich vary from 60 to 160/min for paramedics. Aim of this study is to investigate whether the use of feedback-devices during cardiac-pulmonary resuscitation (CPR) can lead to an improvement of the cardiac output and may improve survival.

For this, we examine the impact of different feedback-methods on the frequence-variety on manikin by lay rescuers. Overall, we compare three different devices for feedback during CPR. The subjects for this study are lay rescuers who perform a 5 minute chest-compression-only CPR.

Study Oversight

Has Oversight DMC: False
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?: None
Is a FDA Regulated Device?: None
Is an Unapproved Device?: None
Is a PPSD?: None
Is a US Export?: None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: