Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-25 @ 2:32 AM
Ignite Modification Date:
2026-03-03 @ 4:33 AM
Study NCT ID:
NCT02459834
Status:
COMPLETED
Last Update Posted:
2017-08-08
First Post:
2015-05-21
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
True
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
The Fructose and Allulose Catalytic Effects (FACE) Trial
Sponsor:
University of Toronto
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
An Acute Randomized Dose-finding Equivalence Trial of Small, Catalytic Doses of Fructose and Allulose on Postprandial Carbohydrate Metabolism: The Fructose and Allulose Catalytic Effects (FACE) Study
Status:
COMPLETED
Status Verified Date:
2017-08
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
Diabetes remains one of the most important unmet prevention and treatment challenges, and the prevalence of diabetes continues to grow. Some functional food ingredients may hold promise as potential therapies for diabetes. One such functional food is allulose, which is a c-3 epimer of fructose. Allulose is a non-caloric sugar found naturally in small amounts in foods such as dried fruits, brown sugar and maple syrup. Previous research has found that catalytic doses of fructose and allulose have been shown to decrease the postprandial glycemic responses to high glycemic index meals. Fructose, in exchange for other carbohydrates, has also been found to decrease HbA1c levels. Whether the effects of fructose and allulose are equivalent is of particular interest, as allulose represents a non-caloric alternative to fructose. The minimum 'catalytic' dose at which improvements in carbohydrate metabolism are observed also remains to be determined for each of the sugars in people with and without diabetes. This study is an acute randomized controlled dose-finding equivalence trial to assess the effect of fructose and allulose at 2 dose levels (5g and 10g) compared with control (0g) on the glucose and insulin responses to a 75g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) in healthy and type 2 diabetes participants.
Detailed Description:
Diabetes remains one of the most important unmet prevention and treatment challenges. Despite the growing armamentarium of medications, which include six new classes of drugs since metformin was first approved in 1995 in the US, the combined prevalence of impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) and diabetes continues to grow. Although oral antihyperglycaemic agents have been shown to prevent the development of diabetes in high-risk individuals and to reduce the risk of microvascular complications in individuals with type 2 diabetes, they have failed to deliver the anticipated macrovascular benefits.
Some functional food ingredients may hold promise as potential therapies for diabetes. An emerging literature has shown that low-dose fructose and its c-3 epimer, allulose (a non-caloric sugar found naturally in small amounts in foods such as dried fruits, brown sugar, and maple syrup which is generally recognized as safe \[GRAS\] by the FDA under GRN 400 since 2012 and GRN 498 since 2014) may benefit glycemic control.
Clinical translation of these findings has proven promising. Catalytic doses of fructose at 7.5g and 10g and allulose at 5g, 7.5g, and 10g (but not 2.5g) have been shown to decrease the postprandial glycemic responses to high glycemic index meals (oral glucose, maltodextrins, or mashed potatoes) from \~15-30% in healthy participants and those with prediabetes or diabetes. These acute effects have been shown to be sustainable over the longer term in the case of fructose. In separate systematic reviews and meta-analyses of controlled feeding trials, the investigators showed that both small doses (defined as ≤36g/day based on 3 meals at ≤10g/meal and 2 snacks at ≤3g/snack) and higher doses (median, 60g/day) of fructose in exchange for other carbohydrates decreased HbA1c by 0.4% and 0.53%, respectively, a level of reduction which exceed the clinically meaningful threshold of 0.3% proposed by the Federal Drug Administration (FDA) for the development of new oral anti-hyperglycemic agents.
Although these findings provide a compelling proof of concept, there is an urgent need for replication studies. Whether the effects of fructose and allulose are equivalent is of particular interest, as allulose represents a non-caloric alternative to fructose. The minimum 'catalytic' dose at which improvements in carbohydrate metabolism are observed also remains to be determined for each of the sugars in people with and without diabetes.
OBJECTIVES
* To assess the acute catalytic effects of fructose and allulose at 2 dose levels (5g, 10g) compared with control (0g) on glucose and insulin responses to a 75g oral glucose tolerance test (75g-OGTT) in healthy participants and participants with type 2 diabetes.
* To assess whether there is a dose response or threshold over the proposed dose range (0g, 5g, 10g) for the effects of fructose and allulose on glucose and insulin responses to a 75g-OGTT in healthy participants and participants with type 2 diabetes.
* To assess whether the effects of allulose and fructose are equivalent on the primary endpoint of incremental area under the curve (iAUC) for plasma glucose across the 2 dose levels (5g and 10g) compared with control (0g) in healthy participants and participants with type 2 diabetes.
Some functional food ingredients may hold promise as potential therapies for diabetes. An emerging literature has shown that low-dose fructose and its c-3 epimer, allulose (a non-caloric sugar found naturally in small amounts in foods such as dried fruits, brown sugar, and maple syrup which is generally recognized as safe \[GRAS\] by the FDA under GRN 400 since 2012 and GRN 498 since 2014) may benefit glycemic control.
Clinical translation of these findings has proven promising. Catalytic doses of fructose at 7.5g and 10g and allulose at 5g, 7.5g, and 10g (but not 2.5g) have been shown to decrease the postprandial glycemic responses to high glycemic index meals (oral glucose, maltodextrins, or mashed potatoes) from \~15-30% in healthy participants and those with prediabetes or diabetes. These acute effects have been shown to be sustainable over the longer term in the case of fructose. In separate systematic reviews and meta-analyses of controlled feeding trials, the investigators showed that both small doses (defined as ≤36g/day based on 3 meals at ≤10g/meal and 2 snacks at ≤3g/snack) and higher doses (median, 60g/day) of fructose in exchange for other carbohydrates decreased HbA1c by 0.4% and 0.53%, respectively, a level of reduction which exceed the clinically meaningful threshold of 0.3% proposed by the Federal Drug Administration (FDA) for the development of new oral anti-hyperglycemic agents.
Although these findings provide a compelling proof of concept, there is an urgent need for replication studies. Whether the effects of fructose and allulose are equivalent is of particular interest, as allulose represents a non-caloric alternative to fructose. The minimum 'catalytic' dose at which improvements in carbohydrate metabolism are observed also remains to be determined for each of the sugars in people with and without diabetes.
OBJECTIVES
* To assess the acute catalytic effects of fructose and allulose at 2 dose levels (5g, 10g) compared with control (0g) on glucose and insulin responses to a 75g oral glucose tolerance test (75g-OGTT) in healthy participants and participants with type 2 diabetes.
* To assess whether there is a dose response or threshold over the proposed dose range (0g, 5g, 10g) for the effects of fructose and allulose on glucose and insulin responses to a 75g-OGTT in healthy participants and participants with type 2 diabetes.
* To assess whether the effects of allulose and fructose are equivalent on the primary endpoint of incremental area under the curve (iAUC) for plasma glucose across the 2 dose levels (5g and 10g) compared with control (0g) in healthy participants and participants with type 2 diabetes.
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
Is an Unapproved Device?:
Is a PPSD?:
Is a US Export?:
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: