Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-25 @ 2:31 AM
Ignite Modification Date:
2026-03-06 @ 9:56 AM
Study NCT ID:
NCT01993134
Status:
UNKNOWN
Last Update Posted:
2013-11-25
First Post:
2013-11-11
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
True
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
Efficacy Assessment of Two Antibiotic Prophylaxis Regimens in Oral and Maxillofacial Trauma Surgery
Sponsor:
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
Efficacy Assessment of Two Antibiotic Prophylaxis Regimens in Oral and Maxillofacial Trauma Surgery.
Status:
UNKNOWN
Status Verified Date:
2013-11
Last Known Status:
RECRUITING
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
EAPRTS
Brief Summary:
The study set out to evaluate the efficacy of two antibiotic prophylaxis regimens in patients with facial fractures admitted to the Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Traumatology services of the Onofre Lopes University Hospital attached to the Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte.
Detailed Description:
The study set out to evaluate the efficacy of two antibiotic prophylaxis regimens in patients with facial fractures admitted to the Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Traumatology services of the Onofre Lopes University Hospital attached to the Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte.This clinical study was prospective, randomized and controlled. Patients underwent surgery for facial fracture reduction and fixation under general anesthetic. Prior to surgery, patients were randomly divided into two groups. Group 1 patients each received 2g of Cefazolin (Cefazolin Sodium - Ampoule- 1g - Genéricos Brasil), administered intravenously but none was administered in the post-operative period. Group II patients received the same dose prior to the operation but in the post-operative period they also received 4 additional 1 g doses of Cefazolin intravenously, completing a 24 period of antibiotic prophylaxis. In the case of operations that lasted for more than 4 hours, an additional 1g dose was given.
The surgical operations involved intra and extra-oral interventions and when required internal rigid fixation was undertaken using titanium plates and screws. Patients were given advice on oral hygiene procedures to be followed in the post-operative period that included chlorhexidine (0.12%) oral rinses and care to be taken with the surgical wounds.
Post-operative follow up was conducted in the 1st, 2nd, 4th and 6th weeks. The criteria used to determine the presence of infection were: a) pus drainage at the fracture site or in the vicinity of the surgical intervention site; b) increased swelling 7 days after the operation; c) presence of a fistula in the area of the surgical intervention or at the site of the fracture, with active drainage; d) other clinical features observed by the evaluator including typical signs of infection such as fever, edema, and localized redness.
Descriptive analysis was made of the independent variables, namely, age, sex, presence of systemic diseases, trauma cause, drug use (tobacco, alcohol, marijuana, crack, cocaine , etc.), the time lapse between the trauma event and the surgical operation, length of the operation, and the measures adopted when infections were detected.
The surgical operations involved intra and extra-oral interventions and when required internal rigid fixation was undertaken using titanium plates and screws. Patients were given advice on oral hygiene procedures to be followed in the post-operative period that included chlorhexidine (0.12%) oral rinses and care to be taken with the surgical wounds.
Post-operative follow up was conducted in the 1st, 2nd, 4th and 6th weeks. The criteria used to determine the presence of infection were: a) pus drainage at the fracture site or in the vicinity of the surgical intervention site; b) increased swelling 7 days after the operation; c) presence of a fistula in the area of the surgical intervention or at the site of the fracture, with active drainage; d) other clinical features observed by the evaluator including typical signs of infection such as fever, edema, and localized redness.
Descriptive analysis was made of the independent variables, namely, age, sex, presence of systemic diseases, trauma cause, drug use (tobacco, alcohol, marijuana, crack, cocaine , etc.), the time lapse between the trauma event and the surgical operation, length of the operation, and the measures adopted when infections were detected.
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
True
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
None
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: