Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-25 @ 2:18 AM
Ignite Modification Date:
2026-03-01 @ 10:09 AM
Study NCT ID:
NCT01898234
Status:
COMPLETED
Last Update Posted:
2013-07-12
First Post:
2013-07-02
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
True
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
Dialysis Membranes and Hemodynamic Tolerance
Sponsor:
Ospedale Regionale di Locarno
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
Assessment of Subjective and Hemodynamic Tolerance of Different High- and Low-flux Dialysis Membranes in Patients Undergoing Chronic Intermittent Hemodialysis: a Randomized Controlled Trial
Status:
COMPLETED
Status Verified Date:
2013-07
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
Background:
High- and low-flux dialysis membranes made of different materials may correlate with various hemodynamic tolerance profiles. This study aims to investigate hemodynamic response and incidence of hypotensive episodes by comparing some of the most commonly used high- and low-flux dialyzers.
Methodology:
The study was designed as an open label, randomized, cross-over investigation, including 25 patients undergoing chronic hemodialysis. Four polysulfone dialyzers of 1.8 m2, A (Revaclear, Gambro), B (Helixone high flux, Fresenius), C (Xevonta, BBraun) and D (Helixone low flux, Fresenius), were compared with each other. The hemodynamic profile was assessed with a non-invasive technique and patients were asked to provide tolerance feedback through a questionnaire.
High- and low-flux dialysis membranes made of different materials may correlate with various hemodynamic tolerance profiles. This study aims to investigate hemodynamic response and incidence of hypotensive episodes by comparing some of the most commonly used high- and low-flux dialyzers.
Methodology:
The study was designed as an open label, randomized, cross-over investigation, including 25 patients undergoing chronic hemodialysis. Four polysulfone dialyzers of 1.8 m2, A (Revaclear, Gambro), B (Helixone high flux, Fresenius), C (Xevonta, BBraun) and D (Helixone low flux, Fresenius), were compared with each other. The hemodynamic profile was assessed with a non-invasive technique and patients were asked to provide tolerance feedback through a questionnaire.
Detailed Description:
None
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
Is an Unapproved Device?:
Is a PPSD?:
Is a US Export?:
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: